Thursday, May 26, 2011

We are all criminals

Let he (or she) who has never broken the law hurl the first insult.

God meets you where you are

One of the most popular refrains we hear these days about undocumented migrants is that they are criminals because they broke the law. Those who defend undocumented migrants point out that crossing the border is the statutory equivalent of driving without a valid license or jaywalking. And, who has never jaywalked? More pointedly, would you blame someone for jaywalking if they ran across the street to prevent a child from being hit by a car?

There are plenty of people who stand up for undocumented migrants and insist that they are not criminals, just hardworking folks who came to this country for a better life. However, there are fewer people who advocate for “criminal aliens” – immigrants who have committed a crime, and face deportation because of their criminal convictions. When I write a post about a legal permanent resident who has lived in the United States for nearly all their life yet who faces deportation for selling drugs, using drugs, or shoplifting, a prevalent response is: “They broke the law and must face the consequences.” Another response I get is: “Why are you standing up for those immigrants who break the law? Their law-breaking activity is an insult to hard-working, law-abiding Americans.”

The fact of the matter is that most Americans, hard-working, or lazy, have broken the law at some point in their lives. More than half of Americans have use or sold illegal drugs. If we take into account prescription drug abuse, the percentage of people who have broken drug laws is even higher. Most Americans have shoplifted. Others have omitted information from tax forms, taken office supplies home from work, urinated in public, defaced public property, consumed alcohol under the age of 21, or used a false ID to get into a club. The United States is a land of laws and nearly every American has broken one. In fact, nearly every person in the United States has committed an offense that would make them deportable, if they are not U.S. citizens.

Law-breaking in the United States is so prevalent that police officers could not possibly arrest, charge, and prosecute each law-breaker. Drug laws represent a particularly poignant case. Law enforcement agents cannot fully enforce drug laws because drug use and selling are too widespread. As Michelle Alexander notes in her book, The New Jim Crow, more than half of the people in the United States have violated drug laws at some point in their lives, yet relatively few have been punished for this. In any given year, about ten percent of American adults violate drug laws. In 2002, for example, there were 19.5 million illegal drug users. In that same year, 1.5 million people were arrested for using drugs, and 175,000 people were admitted to prison for a drug offense. As law enforcement agents have neither the resources nor the mandate to prosecute every law-breaker, they must be strategic with their resources and enforcement tactics. Being strategic often means focusing law-enforcement efforts on open air drug markets in African-American and Latino communities, while leaving primarily white suburban drug dens alone.

Most people in the United States have broken the law, yet only a few are punished. Punishing every single law-breaker is neither possible nor desirable. Just imagine for a minute what would happen if all 19.5 million drug users were arrested, prosecuted, and jailed. Imagine the families that would be broken apart, the jobs that would be lost, the businesses that would be destroyed. As it is, we are already harsher than most countries when it comes to drug laws. When we look at the total number of prisoners in the United States, our prison population dwarfs that of other, much larger, countries. In 2009, the United States had 2,292,133 people behind bars www.prisonstudies.org . The country with the second highest number of prisoners was China, with 1,650,000 prisoners, followed by Russia, with 809,400, Brazil with 496,251, and India came in fifth place, with 384,753. Much of this disparity is due to the War on Drugs. In most other developed countries, a first time drug offense would lead to no more than six months in jail. In the United States, the typical mandatory minimum sentence for a first-time drug offense in federal court is five or ten years.

The truth is we are all criminals. Only some of us are prosecuted. Most of us walk free.

Our criminal records are a reflection of whether or not we have been caught committing a crime. They are not an accurate reflection of our actual criminal activity. If we define criminals as anyone who has broken the law, nearly all of us are criminals.

I hope we can keep this in mind as we move forward towards immigration reform and away from mass incarceration and mass deportation.

5 comments:

  1. Great article! My husband is currently detained right now (since March 30) for a conviction in 2007 (he pled guilty to avoid prison time and was sentenced to 10 years of probation, but was not informed that this plea would cause him to be put into removal proceedings 5 years later). 
    Nazry ("Naz") a legal resident who has been in the US for 18 years (since he was 13) and as a youngster, had a difficult childhood. He is a native of Singapore and struggled to fit in a predominantly white, small country town. His dad abandoned the family when he was barely 8, and even literally abandoned Nazry in a mall because he got tired of his "whining". He's got some deep wounds and for a time, drugs numbed the pain and also made him "fit in" with the cool kids. But unfortunately, Naz became an addict and that lifestyle caused a run-in with the law. He was arrested in 2005 when he began treatment at a recovery home in Waco. He completed 6 months at the Manna House and became a totally new man, even spiritually. Naz gave his life to Christ within his first month there, choosing to convert from his Muslim background. This displeased his family in Singapore very much and most have disowned him, but he knew it was what he needed to do and it saved his life.

    ReplyDelete
  2. He's been clean for 6 years now, living a life of service to the poor and indigent and sharing the message of recovery with other addicts. He's a passionate and active member locally and regionally of a 12-step program where he speaks at large events about his road to recovery. He sponsors several recovering addicts. We are volunteers in the community and serves our hearts out. He is a recent graduate with several degrees from a local technical college. 
    I met Naz in 2009 when he was the night monitor at the homeless shelter that is run by the same organization that runs the Manna House. I was a summer intern at Mission Waco and I volunteered in several departments, including the homeless shelter. I was immediately impressed by his respect for our homeless brothers and sisters, and how much he cared. He was firm but kind. There are times when other people would've lost it and chewed a resident out, but Naz always kept his cool. He worked there faithfully for 3 years, and only left it to get a day job after we were married. He wanted to be home with me. It is very unsafe for me to be alone in our neighborhood. 

    ReplyDelete
  3. We have been married almost 10 months. I did not expect that in our 7th month of marriage my wonderful husband would be ripped out of my life. We own a home in the most destitute part of our city because we have a heart to serve and build relationships with those that our society considers the "least of these". Our home was robbed the same month we purchased it last year, but we stood our ground and did not run. We feel called here. When I finish my Masters in social work at Baylor University, we plan to open a teen home, for those struggling in addiction and who are also in a home environment that is not healthy or conducive to their educational growth. I current am the assistant youth director at Mission Waco and I see this need. Naz and I are so excited about it. But we're afraid that DHS is going to ruin that for us, and for our community. 
    We've hired an attorney and filed for asylum (due to Singapore's harsh punishment of drug offenders- death by hanging). We don't know if they would punish one of their citizens for a crime committed elsewhere but we don't want to chance it.  

    ReplyDelete
  4. ve started a website wesupportnaz.com and a Facebook group "we support Naz" that has over 800 members. The site has tons of info- like updates on his case, supporter videos, letters and pictures, media coverage, fundraising tools, etc. I've even got wristbands and tshirts printed that have brought in a significant portion of money for the attorney fees. We have a strong community and lots of support that we are grateful for. But we're still apart and it hurts. Naz's workplace is missing him as well. He is a valuable asset in so many ways. We're praying that the judge sees that. His court date is in October. He has already served his time for the crime- why is he being imprisoned NOW? this is a waste of tax dollars. Most people who blindly support immigrant detainment don't realize it costs the government $200 a day per inmate, usually paid to a private facility like CCA or GEO. It makes me sick that my husband could be out here, working and paying taxes, but instead is in there, using up thousands of tax dollars for no reason at all. 

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you for posting this. My family is going through a difficult time now, my partner, and sons father has been detained for 2 months now. A past conviction is keeping him incarcerated and preventing him from staying with us. We are working hard on trying to get him home. I've just started blogging about our story, I needed a way to let out my emotions to stay sane, especially since this will be taking a very long time. (http://cairoandamericamissjose.blogspot.com/) I look forward to your posts.

    ReplyDelete